RECORD DETAIL
Back To Previous
Back To Previous
| Title | Facility Planning and Alternative Selection for Finish Product Strorage (Case Study : PT. Unilever Indonesia Tbk) |
| Edition | |
| Call Number | 2008/I/25 |
| ISBN/ISSN | |
| Author(s) | Ardhi Iqra Mandrian |
| Subject(s) | Facilities planning Finish Product Warehouse |
| Classification | 658.202 |
| Series Title | GMD | Tugas Akhir |
| Language | Indonesia |
| Publisher | Jurusan Teknik Industri FTI-ITS |
| Publishing Year | 2008 |
| Publishing Place | Surabaya |
| Collation | |
| Abstract/Notes | |
| Specific Detail Info | PT UNILEVER INDONESIA Tbk, one of the best companies in Indonesia, is a company that produces daily needs products, especially in nutrient, hygiene, and personal care. Their products spread all over Indonesia with the highest market share for most of its products. Plant SCC & C (Spread Cooking Category and Culinary) is one of the factories that they privately owned. It produce margarine based products and culinary seasonings. The main concern in this research is planning the facility for finish product storage. By predicting the amount of the product that need to be kept, and then calculating the needs of facility and comparing it with the existing condition of the warehouse. The gaps are collected and improved. This improvement then involving the available alternative in finish product storage and selecting the best alternative based on cost and company’s perspective. Some aspects and parameters observed in this research shows that the existing condition facility need to be improved. Some aspects observed are storage space, material handling equipment and labor. From the field observation, it can be concluded that there is lacks of storage space in the finish product warehouse. The needs of storage is 3290 storage slots for three years ahead, and the existing facility only have 2000 storage slots, it means that the gap is 1290 storage slots. And then, after calculating the rate of incoming inventory for three years ahead and simulating it with ARENA, the needs for material handling equipments for facility adjustment alternative in year 2008 is 4 reach truck and 2 forklift, in year 2009 is 4 reach truck and 2 forklift, in year 2010 is 5 reach truck and 2 forklift. The needs for material handling equipments for lease public warehouse alternative in year 2008 is 3 reach truck and 2 forklift, in year 2009 is 3 reach truck and 2 forklift, in ii year 2010 is 4 reach truck and 2 forklift. Special for lease public warehouse alternative, the material handling equipment need to be add with 1 forklift and 1 wings truck for certain period (following the lease warehouse period). In 2008 the period lies from July to September, in 2009 the period lies from May until September, in 2010 the period lies from April until September. The number of labors needed will precisely the same with number of material handling equipment of the chosen alternative. And from the alternative selection, the value of benefit / cost ratio for facility adjustment is 1.043 and 0.955 for the lease public warehouse alternative. So, based on the value of benefit / cost ratio, the best alternative is the facility adjustment. Key words: facility planning, finish product warehouse, alternative selection |
| Image |  |
| File Attachment | LOADING LIST... |
| Pembimbing | Ir. Sritomo Wignjosoebroto, M.Sc. |
| Volume | 1 |
| Availability | LOADING LIST... |
| Back To Previous |