RECORD DETAIL
Back To Previous
Back To Previous
| Title | Business Scheme Analysis For Landing Gear Overhaul Of Boeing 737-800 NG Between PT. GMF Aero Asia and PT. Garuda Indonesia |
| Edition | |
| Call Number | 2015/I/27 |
| ISBN/ISSN | |
| Author(s) | Wibowo, Troy Agung |
| Subject(s) | Risk Identification Business Scheme Risk Mitigation Options |
| Classification | 650 Wib b |
| Series Title | GMD | Tugas Akhir |
| Language | Inggris |
| Publisher | Jurusan Teknik Industri FTI - ITS |
| Publishing Year | 2015 |
| Publishing Place | Surabaya |
| Collation | 24 cm |
| Abstract/Notes | Keywords : fair business scheme, overhaul landing gear Boeing 737-800 NG, risk identification, risk mitigation options |
| Specific Detail Info | Referring to maintenance schedule data from Garuda Indonesia, starting from 2017 until 2021 there is a need for overhaul the Landing Gear of Boeing 737-800 NG that owned by Garuda Indonesia. GMF Aero Asia as the subsidiary of Garuda Indonesia Group has the responsibility to provide the maintenance demand from its parent company. Business agreement is developed between both parties. The business agreement arranges on several parameters. Those are, maintenance schedule, number of landing gear spares need to be provided, and the ownership combination of the spares. From the combination of those three parameters, there are 27 schemes that possible to apply. From both Garuda Indonesia and GMF Aero Asia have different preferences to choose which scheme is the best for them. Garuda Indonesia intends to choose scheme with the lowest cost. However, GMF Aero Asia prefers to choose scheme that will generate profit as high as possible. In the business practice, Garuda Indonesia as the parent company has higher authority to choose the applied scheme. According to this practice, this research intends to find scheme that gives fair benefit for both objectives. Fair scheme is scheme that does not give advantages for GMF to maximize the profit, but Garuda needs to pay at very high cost. Or else, scheme that will minimize the cost for Garuda but GMF will earns low profit. Profit and Loss Analysis is used to identify the profit and cost generated by each scheme. The fair scheme selection used two steps. First, filter the scheme that accepted by both Garuda and GMF based on the acceptance area. The chosen scheme then ranked using gap value. Scheme with lowest gap value will be chosen as the fair scheme. Next step, identify risks that possible to change the expected output from the chosen scheme. The identification includes risks that against the objective from each parties. After the risks identified, mitigation scheme is proposed to minimize the impact changes to the profit and cost generated by each party. |
| Image |  |
| File Attachment | LOADING LIST... |
| Pembimbing | Yudha Prasetyawan,ST,M.Eng |
| Volume | |
| Availability | LOADING LIST... |
| Back To Previous |